Best Yodeck Alternative (2026): ScreenBox vs Yodeck
Looking for an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Yodeck? Here is an honest comparison covering pricing, features, platform support, and where each tool fits best.
The short answer
Yodeck is a polished, easy-to-use cloud digital signage product with a Pi player included on paid plans. It is a great fit if you want to plug in and go and you are happy with cloud-only hosting and per-screen pricing.
ScreenBox is open source (MIT licensed), self-hostable, and runs on any screen you already own with no hardware lock-in. It is a better fit if you want to keep your data on your own infrastructure, avoid per-screen lock-in, or you have more than a handful of screens and want to control the cost curve.
Quick comparison
| Feature | ScreenBox | Yodeck |
|---|---|---|
| Open source | Yes (MIT) | No |
| Self-host option | Yes | No (cloud only) |
| Free option | Free self-hosting; 14-day trial | 1 device |
| Android TV / Fire TV | Yes | Yes |
| Raspberry Pi | Free setup script | Player included on paid plans |
| Windows / ChromeOS | Yes (web player) | Yes |
| Web browser player | Yes | Yes |
| Video walls (multi-screen sync) | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-zone layouts | Yes | Yes |
| Live remote control* | Yes | Screenshot only |
| Kiosk / interactive mode | Yes | Yes |
| White-label / reseller | Yes | Enterprise tier |
| Pricing for 15 devices | $75/mo ($5/screen) | ~$120/mo (8 USD/screen) |
| Self-host cost | Free (your server) | Not available |
* Live remote control is Android only and requires granting the on-device accessibility permission.
Comparison as of June 2026, based on each vendor's publicly listed pricing and documentation. Spot an error? Open an issue on GitHub and we'll fix it.
Where Yodeck does well
- Onboarding. Yodeck ships pre-configured Pi players on paid plans, which removes a real setup step for non-technical buyers.
- Polish. The product has been around since 2014, and the cloud experience is mature.
- Templates. A large pre-built template library for menus, lobby boards, and announcements.
Where ScreenBox is the better choice
- You need data sovereignty. If your content includes PII, internal documents, or you operate in regulated industries (healthcare, government, finance), self-hosting is the only way to keep data off a third-party cloud. Yodeck cannot do this.
- You have more than a handful of screens. Per-screen pricing scales linearly. ScreenBox is $5/screen/month - $75/mo at 15 devices - and self-hosters pay nothing per device. At 50+ screens the total cost difference is significant.
- You want platform flexibility. ScreenBox runs on any device with a browser - Smart TVs, ChromeOS, kiosk PCs, even old Macs. You are not locked into a specific Pi SKU.
- You want to read or modify the source. ScreenBox is MIT licensed on GitHub. Audit the code, extend it, or fork it.
- You want live remote control. ScreenBox streams a live screenshot feed and forwards touches and key events back to the device. Yodeck only takes occasional screenshots.
Pricing snapshot
Yodeck charges per screen per month, typically $8/screen/mo on the standard plan with annual billing. ScreenBox is $5/screen/mo - $75/mo for 15 devices against Yodeck's ~$120 - so it is cheaper at every screen count, and the gap grows as you add screens. Self-hosters pay nothing per device.
Try ScreenBox free
Start a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.
Start Free Trial View on GitHub